He also announced that he would go even further in the second phase. Among the two demands that Imran Khan put before the government, one is to release the under-trial political prisoners while the other is to form a judicial commission for a transparent investigation into the incidents of May 9 and November 26. Imran Khan also gave time till December 14 to comply with these demands.
The party leaders are worried about the announcement that Khan Sahib did this again without consulting any PTI leader. One was that such an important announcement was made without consulting anyone and without telling anyone, and secondly, these leaders almost agreed that the movement of civil disobedience announced by Imran Khan was not implemented. Maybe and like the past, this movement of civil disobedience will also fail.
Imran Khan must have thought that after his announcement, Pakistanis living abroad will reduce their remittances, which will reduce Pakistan’s remittances and thus the country will suffer from economic difficulties, which will make the government and establishment of Imran Khan. Demands will be forced to comply. Remittances are related to overseas Pakistanis who send money to their spouses, children, parents or other family members and relatives living in Pakistan every month or after some time.
Now, if Imran Khan wants the large number of people who go abroad for work or Pakistanis living abroad to reduce the expenses sent to their wives, children, parents and other relatives, then it is not possible. Neither any other overseas Pakistani who wants to build land and house for himself here or want to do any business will listen to Imran Khan.
Well, those overseas Pakistanis, especially those living in America, Britain and Europe, who have a lot of money, mostly keep their money outside the country. Imran Khan, during his government, expected such Pakistanis to bring their money to Pakistan. Murad Saeed had said that the people living abroad will bring so much money to Imran Khan’s government that they will pay the foreign debt of 100 billion dollars. It was also expected that when Imran Khan’s government ends, there will be a decrease in remittances from abroad, but on the contrary, there is a record increase in remittances.
The leaders of Tehreek-e-Insaaf also believe that neither overseas Pakistanis will stop sending money to Pakistan nor those living here will burn their electricity and gas bills because this did not happen in 2014 and is not possible now. According to the sources, the party leaders during their consultation also said that it will not be possible even for the party leaders if the electricity and gas bills are not given.
During the 2014 sit-in, Imran Khan announced a civil disobedience movement, burning electricity and gas bills and demanding people to contribute fully to the movement, but submitted the bills to his house in Bani Gala. That movement also failed, and no such movement would have resulted differently. Now the party leader will meet Imran Khan in jail to explain and withdraw this announcement. Khan Sahib believes that no one has any idea. It is being said that Imran Khan has played his last card. Whatever it is, Imran Khan continues to do his damage.
Imran Khan’s Civil Disobedience Declaration: A Risky Political Gamble?
Imran Khan, the former high minister of Pakistan and chief of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), has another time made a controversial political circulate with the aid of saying a civil disobedience motion. This selection has not only amazed many but has also left his own celebration leaders concerned about the ability results. The assertion, made without consulting PTI’s senior management, needs the discharge of under-trial political prisoners and the formation of a judicial commission to analyze the incidents of May 9 and November 26. Imran Khan has set December 14 as the closing date for the government to meet these demands.
Even as Khan’s supporters might also view this as an ambitious and strategic flow, political analysts or even his very own birthday party leaders accept that it can backfire and, in the end, weaken his political status. His previous strive at civil disobedience in 2014 failed, and plenty of worry history should repeat itself.
Civil Disobedience: A Strategic Circulation or a Political Miscalculation?
Imran Khan’s civil disobedience approach seems to be based on the assumption that Pakistanis dwelling abroad will lessen their remittances, leading to monetary problems for the government. In concept, this economic strain ought to force the ruling authorities to provide for his needs. But the practicality of this strategy is extraordinarily questionable for numerous motives:
Remittances Are sent for circle of relatives assist, no longer Political moves
Remote places Pakistanis send cash to assist their families—not for political agendas.
No person would deliberately withhold monetary assistance from their spouses, children, or dad and mom just to place pressure on the government.
Pakistan’s Remittances Have continued to growth
Regardless of political instability, remittances have remained strong or even multiplied.
Many Pakistanis operating abroad see sending cash home as an monetary necessity, no longer a political preference.
rich distant places Pakistanis hold Their Wealth abroad
Wealthy expatriates in the main keep their investments outside Pakistan.
Even in the course of Imran Khan’s tenure, the expectation that overseas Pakistanis could convey in huge investments never materialized.
Murad Saeed’s claim that expats would repay Pakistan’s overseas debt of $100 billion remained an unfulfilled promise.
demanding situations within PTI: internal worries Over Khan’s choice
Even as Imran Khan might believe this method will create monetary distress and force the authorities’s hand, many senior PTI leaders disagree. Some of their issues include:
Loss of internal consultation
Khan made this fundamental political selection on my own, without involving senior PTI individuals.
Birthday celebration leaders believe this pinnacle-down choice-making style weakens PTI’s team spirit.
Failure of beyond Civil Disobedience tries
At some stage in the 2014 take-a seat-in, Khan advocated for people to burn energy and gasoline payments; however, the motion failed.
mockingly, Khan himself paid his own utility bills in Bani Gala, contradicting his message.
No Public Willingness for financial Disruption
Normal Pakistanis will no longer forestall paying their bills or cut remittances to damage their personal economy.
Even PTI contributors privately acknowledge that civil disobedience actions are not often painted in Pakistan.
PTI Leaders worry Backlash
If PTI supporters refuse to pay application bills, many should face critical monetary outcomes, consisting of disconnection of services.
Even senior PTI leaders are unlikely to, in my view, follow through on this civil disobedience.
What Comes Next? Will Imran Khan withdraw this choice?
Given the internal resistance inside PTI, senior birthday party leaders are planning to fulfill Imran Khan in prison to convince him to withdraw the declaration. They accept as true that:
This move could in addition weaken PTI because it will probable fail much like the 2014 movement.
The authorities will now not experience being compelled, as remittances and bill payments will hold as common.
Khan is playing his last political card, and if this fails, it’s going to simplest damage his credibility further.
A Self-Inflicted Political Setback?
Imran Khan’s civil disobedience announcement appears to be a volatile gamble that would backfire. While it is able to energize some of his die-hard supporters, the wider public and PTI management see little practicality in this method. History shows that such financial disruption techniques are not often used in Pakistan, and there may be little indication that this time will be extraordinary.
If PTI leaders manage to persuade Khan to abandon this approach, it can help the party keep away from in addition political harm. However, if Imran Khan insists on pushing forward, it may weaken PTI’s role and provide the ruling authorities with a much more potent upper hand.
Ultimately, civil disobedience movements require widespread public participation and clear strategic benefits—both of which appear to be missing from Imran Khan’s modern-day circulate.